South Africa’s Peppol Einvoicing Mandate 2028: What It Means for International Trading Partners

Justin De Jager
december 8, 2025
26 min read
Actualiteiten en Achtergrond, Praktische Gidsen, Wetgeving, Beleid en Verplichtingen

South Africa Chooses Peppol 5-Corner Model: What Does Mandatory Einvoicing from 2028 Mean for Its Trading Partners?

On 16 August 2025, the South African Ministry of Finance (National Treasury) and the South African Revenue Service (SARS) published the Draft 2025 Tax Administration Laws Amendment Bill. This bill introduces formal definitions of electronic invoicing for the first time and announces the implementation of an interoperability framework for real-time tax data exchange. With this step, South Africa is poised to become the first major African economy to introduce mandatory business-to-business electronic invoicing via the international Peppol network.

For companies active in the South African market – technology suppliers, exporters of high-value products, logistics service providers, or consultancy firms – this development has direct implications. South Africa is deliberately choosing the same Peppol-based 5-corner model that Belgium and France are implementing. This means that companies already investing in Peppol connectivity for Europe may be able to reuse this infrastructure for their South African trading relationships. A strategic opportunity that extends beyond mere compliance.

The Facts at a Glance

The bill introduces formal definitions of “electronic invoice”, “electronic report” and an “interoperability framework” for secure real-time tax data exchange. This legal basis paves the way for mandatory electronic invoicing in all business-to-business transactions.

The key elements:

Implementation: 2028 or later (exact date still to be determined)

Model: Peppol-based 5-corner model with real-time VAT reporting

Scope: All VAT-registered B2B transactions

Current status: Draft legislation published, second public consultation expected end of 2025

Final legislation: Expected in 2026

Why This Change?

South Africa is struggling with substantial VAT fraud. Estimates range from ZAR 22 billion to ZAR 50 billion (approximately €1.1 to €2.5 billion) in lost tax revenue per year. The government originally sought alternatives to a planned VAT increase from 15% to 16%, which was ultimately scrapped. Instead, they chose to digitise the tax system through einvoicing and real-time reporting.

Context: South Africa’s Einvoicing History

Einvoicing is currently voluntary in South Africa, but subject to strict rules since December 2021. SARS has published detailed requirements for companies choosing to invoice electronically. The new legislation marks the shift from voluntary to mandatory – a fundamental course change that brings the country in line with international trends.

The Peppol 5-Corner Model: How Does It Work?

South Africa is explicitly considering a Peppol-based 5-corner model, also known as the Decentralized Continuous Transaction Control and Exchange (DCTCE) model. This is the same model that Belgium is implementing from 2026 and France from 2026-2027.

The five corners explained:

Corner 1 – Sending company (Supplier): The South African company issuing the invoice, or an international company with a South African establishment.

Corner 2 – Sender’s Access Point: The certified Peppol Service Provider that validates the invoice according to South African specifications and sends it via the Peppol network. This provider simultaneously reports transaction data to SARS.

Corner 3 – Receiver’s Access Point: The certified provider that receives the invoice and delivers it to the customer.

Corner 4 – Receiving company (Buyer): The South African company receiving the invoice.

Corner 5 – SARS (South African Revenue Service): The tax authority automatically receives reporting of all transaction data for real-time VAT monitoring and fraud detection.

What Makes This Different from Other Models?

Unlike centralised clearance models such as in Italy (SDI), Poland (KSeF) or Greece (myDATA), the 5-corner model does not require pre-validation by the tax authority before the invoice goes to the customer. The exchange between companies and the reporting to SARS happen in parallel, not sequentially.

Advantages of the 5-corner model:

  • No pre-clearance bottleneck: Invoices are not delayed by government validation
  • International interoperability: Direct compatibility with Belgian, French and other Peppol markets
  • Decentralised architecture: No single point of failure with one central government platform
  • Market competition: Competition between certified providers on price, functionality and service
  • Real-time compliance: SARS receives transaction data in real-time without blocking the invoice flow

Why Is South Africa Choosing Peppol?

SARS has conducted extensive research into various einvoicing models before choosing the Peppol direction. The agency studied implementations in:

  • Italy: Centralised SDI clearance platform
  • Poland: Central KSeF system with mandatory pre-validation
  • Chile: Latin American clearance model
  • India: Large-scale central system
  • Uganda: African fiscalisation experiment
  • France and Belgium: Peppol 5-corner models
  • EU ViDA: European VAT in the Digital Age directive
  • United Kingdom: Peppol-based plans for 2029

The strategic considerations:

South Africa’s economy is internationally oriented. The country is an important trading partner for Europe, and the connection with the international Peppol network eliminates trade barriers. By choosing Peppol, South African companies can use the same infrastructure for trade with Europe, Asia-Pacific (Singapore, Australia, Japan) and any future African Peppol countries.

The timing is strategic: By implementing in 2028, South Africa can learn from the experiences of Belgium (January 2026), France (September 2026), Ireland (November 2028) and other early adopters. The country sees the teething problems, best practices and pitfalls before its own system goes live.

The South African Context: More Than Just Einvoicing

The einvoicing initiative is part of a broader VAT Modernisation Project that SARS is rolling out. This project includes:

1. VAT return modernisation: New, more detailed VAT returns with disaggregated data fields. The structure is based on transaction data from einvoices, enabling pre-filling.

2. Digital data transmission: All tax data is exchanged digitally and in structured format. This goes beyond just invoices – think credit notes, debit notes and other transaction documents.

3. Continuous Transaction Controls (CTC): Real-time monitoring of transactions instead of periodic retrospective controls. This is the core of the 5-corner model.

4. Stakeholder engagement: Intensive consultation with companies, software providers, accountants and trade associations to make the system practically workable.

The economic incentive:

By reducing VAT fraud by ZAR 22-50 billion per year, the government avoids a politically sensitive VAT increase. Einvoicing is seen as a win-win: better compliance and lower administrative burdens for honest companies through automation.

When Does the Obligation Apply to Whom?

This is the crucial question for international companies. The exact scope is still being worked out in the legislation, but based on the Draft Bill and international comparisons, we can expect the following:

The obligation probably applies to:

  • All VAT-registered companies with a registered seat or head office in South Africa
  • Foreign companies with a fixed establishment/permanent establishment in South Africa
  • All domestic B2B transactions where both parties are VAT-registered

The obligation probably does NOT apply to:

  • Foreign suppliers without a fixed establishment in South Africa (but details still to be confirmed)
  • B2C transactions (business to consumer)
  • Certain exempt transactions
  • Possibly: small enterprises below a certain turnover threshold (still to be determined)

Important: The final scope will be clarified in the final legislation (expected 2026) after the second public consultation end of 2025. For foreign suppliers, this is a critical point to monitor.

Scenarios for International Companies Trading with South Africa

Let’s walk through three concrete situations that illustrate how the mandate may affect international entrepreneurs with a trading relationship with South African companies and/or organisations.

Scenario 1: The Dutch Exporter Without Establishment in South Africa

AgriTech Solutions BV from Wageningen exports advanced greenhouse technology to Cape Agricultural Distributors (Pty) Ltd in Cape Town. AgriTech has no office or personnel in South Africa, but does have a South African VAT registration for these supplies.

The probable reality:

Based on international patterns, foreign suppliers without a fixed establishment often fall outside the B2B einvoicing mandate. AgriTech could therefore continue invoicing as usual via PDF or traditional methods.

But – and this is crucial:

Cape Agricultural Distributors will be required from 2028 to receive and process all invoices from South African suppliers electronically via the Peppol network. This means the South African company must maintain two different invoice processing channels:

  • Electronic invoices via Peppol for all South African suppliers (automatic processing, pre-filled VAT returns, real-time compliance)
  • Traditional invoices from international suppliers like AgriTech (manual processing, no automatic integration)

The dual administration problem:

For Cape Agricultural, considerable complexity arises. They must maintain two parallel systems, leading to increased operational costs. Processing becomes more error-prone because there are no uniform processes. VAT processing for international invoices is less efficient because it must be done manually. This often results in longer payment terms for non-einvoices because processing takes more time.

The strategic opportunity for AgriTech:

Although not mandatory, voluntary adoption of Peppol-based einvoicing can offer substantial benefits:

  • Stronger customer relationships: You relieve the administrative burden on your South African customers
  • Faster payments: Einvoices are typically processed faster
  • Competitive advantage: You differentiate yourself from competitors who remain traditional
  • Future-proofing: If South Africa later extends to all suppliers, you’re already ready
  • Reusability: Investment in Peppol also works for Belgium, France and other markets

Scenario 2: The German Company with South African Establishment

Automotive Components GmbH from Stuttgart has a production facility in Durban with its own personnel, machines, warehouses and sales office. From this South African establishment, they supply parts to South African car manufacturers and dealers.

The reality:

Foreign companies with a fixed establishment (permanent establishment) in South Africa are considered South African taxpayers for transactions that go through that establishment. Automotive Components GmbH falls fully under the einvoicing mandate.

From 2028, the company must:

  • Send all invoices electronically via a certified Peppol Access Point
  • Integrate their German ERP systems with the South African einvoicing framework
  • Train personnel in the new processes
  • Implement the required invoice format (probably Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 or South African variant)
  • Comply with all South African compliance requirements and reporting to SARS

The criterion: fixed establishment

Not the nationality of the parent company determines the obligation, but the presence of a permanent establishment on South African territory.

Examples of fixed establishments:

  • Production facilities and factories
  • Offices with permanent personnel
  • Distribution centres and warehouses
  • Service centres and after-sales facilities
  • Permanent representatives with decision-making authority

Not a fixed establishment:

  • Temporary projects of a few months
  • Mere storage without further commercial activities
  • Agents without representation authority
  • Incidental business presence for meetings or trade fairs

Scenario 3: The Belgian Consultant Without South African Establishment

Strategy Consulting BVBA from Antwerp provides management advice to South African mining companies and financial institutions. The company has a South African VAT registration for certain projects but no physical presence – consultants fly in for assignments and work from hotels or client offices.

The probable reality:

No fixed establishment probably means no einvoicing obligation. Strategy Consulting can continue invoicing as usual.

The consequence:

Their South African clients will be confronted from 2028 with the dual administration problem: electronic invoices from South African suppliers and traditional invoices from international partners.

The strategic consideration:

For consultancy firms that focus strongly on South Africa, voluntary Peppol adoption can offer a competitive advantage. Especially if you already use Peppol for Belgian clients (mandate since January 2026), the extension to South Africa is relatively straightforward. You use the same infrastructure for multiple markets, making the investment profitable.

European-South African Trade Relations: The Context

To understand the impact of the einvoicing mandate, it’s important to know how substantial European-South African trade relations are.

Trade figures:

South Africa is an important trading partner for Europe. The European Union is South Africa’s largest trading partner, accounting for approximately 30% of total South African trade. In 2023, bilateral trade between the EU and South Africa amounted to more than €40 billion.

European exports to South Africa:

  • Machinery and mechanical equipment
  • Transport equipment and parts
  • Chemical products and pharmaceuticals
  • Electrical machinery and equipment
  • Agricultural products and processed food

South African exports to Europe:

  • Minerals and metals (platinum, palladium, chromium, manganese)
  • Agricultural products (fruit, wine, nuts)
  • Chemical products
  • Food and beverages

Important European trading partners:

Netherlands: With more than €5.7 billion in bilateral trade, the Netherlands is South Africa’s third-largest European trading partner. Dutch specialisations: port and logistics, agri-food technology, water management.

Germany: The largest European trading partner with strong focus on automotive, engineering and chemicals. German companies have substantial production facilities in South Africa.

United Kingdom: Despite Brexit, the UK remains an important partner, especially in financial services, mining technology and consultancy.

France: Strong in infrastructure, energy and retail sectors with major companies like Carrefour and Total active in South Africa.

Italy and Spain: Important partners in textiles, fashion and food industries.

European companies in South Africa:

More than 1,500 European companies are active in South Africa, concentrated in:

  • Automotive: BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen with large production facilities
  • Chemicals and pharmaceuticals: BASF, Bayer, various specialty chemicals
  • Technology and IT: SAP, software developers, IT service providers
  • Engineering: Siemens, ABB, industrial automation
  • Retail and consumer goods: Carrefour, Unilever, various fashion brands
  • Financial services: European banks and insurers

For many of these companies: if they have an establishment in South Africa, they fall under the mandate. If they export from Europe, they probably remain exempt but can strategically choose voluntary adoption.

Comparison with Other African Developments

South Africa is not the only African country implementing einvoicing. The continent is moving towards digitisation of tax systems.

Nigeria: Already operational since August 2025

Nigeria launched Africa’s first fully Peppol-compliant B2G Electronic Fiscal System in August 2025. MTN Nigeria sent the continent’s first electronic invoice to the Federal Inland Revenue Service. Within two weeks, 1,000 of the 5,000 large companies had already integrated their systems.

However, Nigeria uses a centralised clearance model (4-corner with pre-validation), not the decentralised 5-corner model South Africa is considering. The system is currently limited to B2G transactions; a possible extension to B2B is still under consideration.

Eswatini (Swaziland): Fiscalisation project for 2028

The smaller neighbouring country Eswatini has published an Expression of Interest for suppliers of fiscalisation technology, with a targeted implementation in January 2028. The country is looking at international models, including potential Peppol adoption.

Tunisia: Einvoicing pioneer “El Fatoura”

Tunisia introduced an einvoicing system called “El Fatoura” earlier, making the country one of Africa’s pioneers in digital tax administration. However, the system is not Peppol-based.

South Africa’s pioneering role:

If South Africa successfully implements a Peppol-based system, this could be a blueprint for other African countries. The combination of a large economy, strong international trade relations and adoption of international standards makes South Africa a potential model for continental digitisation.

The Timeline: From Consultation to Implementation

Although the exact implementation date is not yet fixed, we can sketch a timeline based on current planning and international comparisons.

August 2025:

  • Draft 2025 Tax Administration Laws Amendment Bill published
  • Definitions introduced for einvoicing and interoperability framework
  • First stakeholder feedback collected

End 2025 – Early 2026:

  • Second public consultation on technical and legal requirements
  • Intensive stakeholder engagement with companies, software providers, accountants
  • SARS publishes more details about the VAT data model
  • Specifications for digital data transmission are worked out

Mid 2026:

  • Final legislation expected
  • Confirmation of implementation date (probably 2028)
  • Publication of technical specifications and standards
  • Accreditation criteria for Peppol Service Providers
  • Possible phased implementation announced (large companies first?)

2026-2027:

  • Development of software and integrations by providers
  • First test environments available for early adopters
  • Training and awareness programmes by SARS
  • Certification of Peppol Access Point providers
  • Publication of guidance and best practices

2027-2028:

  • Intensive preparation phase for companies
  • Large-scale implementation projects at large enterprises
  • Pilot programmes and test phases
  • Possible soft launch for voluntary early adopters
  • Helpdesk and support scaling at SARS

2028 (or later):

  • GO-LIVE: Einvoicing becomes mandatory
  • Possible phased introduction (large companies first, SMEs later)
  • Sanctions for non-compliance (details still to be determined)

2028-2029:

  • Monitoring and optimisation of the system
  • Evaluation of early adopter experiences
  • Possible adjustments based on practice
  • Gradual rollout to all companies

After 2030:

  • Possible alignment with EU ViDA requirements
  • Potential integration with other African systems
  • Further optimisation and new functionality

The Benefits of Early Adoption

Although implementation only becomes mandatory in 2028 or later, there are substantial benefits for companies that start preparing early or implement voluntarily.

1. Learning without pressure

Early adopters can experiment and optimise without the stress of an approaching compliance deadline. You discover teething problems, train personnel and refine processes at your leisure.

2. Competitive advantage

By starting now, you position yourself as a digital leader in your sector. For suppliers to South African companies, this can become a selling point: “We can already invoice electronically via Peppol, which simplifies your administration.”

3. Better customer relationships

South African customers will struggle from 2028 with two invoice channels. By voluntarily invoicing electronically, you significantly relieve their administrative burden. This strengthens loyalty and can yield faster payments.

4. Cost savings

Einvoicing eliminates manual work. It’s estimated that processing a traditional invoice costs €20-€30, while an einvoice costs €5-€10. With large volumes, the savings are substantial.

5. Reusable investment

A Peppol investment for South Africa is directly usable for:

  • Belgium (mandatory since January 2026)
  • France (mandatory from September 2026)
  • Ireland (phased from November 2028)
  • UK (mandatory from April 2029)
  • EU-wide (ViDA from July 2030)
  • Australia, Singapore, Japan and other Peppol countries

6. Access to early adopter support

SARS will likely provide more intensive support to early adopters during pilot phases. You get direct contact with policymakers and can help think about practical implementation.

Practical Advice Per Stakeholder

For Companies with South African Establishment

Immediate actions (now – 2026):

Monitor the consultation: Follow the second public consultation (expected end 2025) and any SARS publications. Consider submitting feedback as a stakeholder.

Inventory your situation:

  • How many invoices do you send and receive monthly in South Africa?
  • Which ERP or accounting system do you use?
  • Are your systems already Peppol-ready for other markets?
  • What is your current VAT compliance process?

Evaluate your software supplier: Ask your ERP provider:

  • What is your South Africa einvoicing roadmap?
  • When will Peppol support for South Africa be available?
  • Can systems integrate with South African Peppol Access Points?
  • What are the costs?

Start with scenario planning: Develop different implementation scenarios depending on:

  • Whether your establishment falls in phase 1 or 2 (if phased implementation)
  • Which internal systems need to be adjusted
  • What the costs and time investment are

Mid 2026 – 2027:

Select a Peppol Access Point provider: Once SARS publishes accreditation criteria, evaluate providers on:

  • South Africa-specific expertise
  • International experience with other mandates
  • Integration possibilities with your ERP
  • Pricing structure (setup, monthly, per invoice)
  • Support and service levels
  • Multi-country capabilities (if you also need Belgium, France etc.)

Start implementation: Especially if you’re in the first mandatory wave, start implementation in 2027:

  • Technical integration with your systems
  • Testing in SARS test environments (once available)
  • Training of personnel
  • Documentation of new processes

Communicate with trading partners: Inform both customers and suppliers about your transition to einvoicing.

2028:

Go-live: Ensure you’re compliant well before the deadline.

Monitor and optimise: The first months you’ll need to refine processes based on practical experiences.

For Dutch Exporters Without South African Establishment

Strategic evaluation (now):

Assess your South African customer portfolio:

  • How many South African customers do you have?
  • What is the total invoice volume to this market?
  • Are these strategic, long-term relationships?
  • How many invoices per year do you send to South Africa?

Analyse your current Peppol status:

  • Do you already use Peppol for Belgium, France or other markets?
  • Do you already have a Peppol Access Point provider?
  • If yes, does it also support South Africa (or can it add this)?

Calculate the business case for voluntary adoption:

CostsBenefitsCosts for Peppol implementation vary greatly depending on your specific situation. Factors determining the price are: the complexity of your current systems, whether you already use Peppol for other markets, your invoice volume, and whether you choose a simple cloud solution or custom integration.Stronger customer relationships through administrative efficiencyNote: if you already use Peppol for Belgium or France, the marginal costs for adding South Africa are often limited.Faster payments through automated processingImportant cost categories to consider:Competitive advantage over traditionally invoicing competitors1. One-time implementation and system integrationReusability of investment for other markets (Belgium, France, UK, EU-wide from 2030)2. Ongoing costs for Peppol connectivity (may be volume-dependent)Preparation for possible future extension of the obligation3. Internal time for training and process adjustment

Evaluation: The business case is strongest with strategic, long-term relationships with substantial invoice volume, especially when you already invest in Peppol for other markets. Compare quotes from different providers and specifically ask about their South Africa support and multi-country capabilities.

Communication with South African customers (2026-2027):

Start the conversation timely with your main South African customers:

“Dear customer,

As you probably know, South Africa is implementing mandatory electronic invoicing via the Peppol network from 2028 for all domestic B2B transactions. Although we as a non-South African supplier are probably not required to invoice via the South African einvoicing system, we understand this may mean administrative complexity for you.

From 2028, you will need to maintain two different invoice processing channels: electronic invoices from South African suppliers via Peppol, and traditional invoices from international partners like us. This can lead to increased costs and longer processing times.

We are therefore investigating the possibility of voluntarily connecting to the Peppol network, so you can process all your invoices uniformly. This would not only simplify your administration, but also further strengthen our cooperation through faster payment processing and fewer administrative errors.

We already use Peppol for our European clients [if applicable], so the extension to South Africa is relatively straightforward for us. We will keep you informed of our decision once the final South African legislation and technical specifications are published.

Do you have questions about this, or do you have a preference? Let us know.

Kind regards, [Your company]”

Timing for decision:

  • Mid 2026: Final legislation and scope known, make strategic choice
  • 2027: Implement if you decide to participate
  • 2028: Benefit from early adoption advantages at go-live

For Accountants and Advisors

Build expertise:

  • Invest in knowledge about Peppol and einvoicing
  • Follow South African developments via SARS publications
  • Study Belgium and France as examples of 5-corner models
  • Develop standard implementation methodologies

Position services:

  • Readiness assessments: Evaluate if clients are prepared
  • Gap analyses: What needs to happen for compliance?
  • Provider selection: Help choose Peppol Access Point
  • Implementation guidance: End-to-end support
  • Training: Offer workshops for administrative teams
  • Ongoing compliance: Periodic checks and updates

Communicate proactively:

Start informing clients now about the coming obligation. Organise webinars or information sessions specifically about South Africa’s einvoicing plans. Help them develop a timely implementation strategy.

Potential Challenges and How to Deal with Them

Although the Peppol 5-corner model offers substantial benefits, there are also challenges companies should consider.

1. Technical complexity

Challenge: Integration of existing ERP systems with Peppol infrastructure can be complex, especially with legacy systems.

Solution:

  • Start early with assessment of your systems
  • Work with experienced implementation partners
  • Consider middleware solutions for legacy systems
  • Plan sufficient time for testing

2. Costs for SMEs

Challenge: Small and medium-sized enterprises may experience implementation costs as a barrier.

Solution:

  • SARS will likely provide specific support for SMEs (as France and Belgium do)
  • Cloud-based invoicing solutions with built-in Peppol are relatively affordable
  • ROI is often positive within 1-2 years through cost savings

3. Change management

Challenge: Personnel must learn new processes and systems.

Solution:

  • Invest in training well before the deadline
  • Use early adoption period for gradual familiarisation
  • Document processes clearly
  • Ensure good internal support

4. Uncertainty about final regulations

Challenge: Details are not yet fully worked out.

Solution:

  • Follow SARS publications and consultations closely
  • Prepare based on international examples
  • Build flexibility into your planning
  • Work with advisors who know multiple jurisdictions

5. Dual invoicing for international trade

Challenge: South African companies may need to maintain two systems.

Solution:

  • As international supplier, consider voluntary Peppol adoption
  • As South African company, choose a provider that supports both channels well
  • Automate where possible to minimise manual work

The Broader African Context and Future Perspective

South Africa’s choice for Peppol has implications that extend beyond the country itself.

Potential domino effect:

If South Africa is successful with Peppol implementation, other African countries may follow. Candidates are:

  • Kenya: Strong tech sector, regional economic leader
  • Ghana: Growing economy with strong trade relations
  • Botswana: Neighbouring country with similar economic structure
  • Namibia: Strong South African connections

African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA):

The AfCFTA, operational since 2021, aims for an integrated African market. Standardised einvoicing via Peppol could significantly facilitate intra-African trade by lowering trade barriers.

Connection with EU ViDA:

South Africa’s timing (2028) is strategically before the EU-wide ViDA requirements (July 2030). European companies trading with South Africa are building infrastructure that’s directly usable for mandatory intra-EU einvoicing two years later.

International support and expertise exchange:

South Africa’s digital transformation can benefit from international expertise and collaboration:

Europe: European countries with Peppol experience can share valuable knowledge. Belgium and France are implementing similar 5-corner models and have lessons learned about stakeholder consultation, phased implementation and change management. European software industry has proven solutions that can be South African-adapted.

Asia-Pacific: Singapore’s successful Peppol implementation (mandatory for B2G since 2019) offers a blueprint for effective adoption in a multi-cultural context. Australia’s gradual approach with clear deadlines and business incentives can serve as an example. Japan’s focus on enterprise-level implementation is relevant for South Africa’s large corporates.

Latin America: Chile has years of experience with clearance models and real-time reporting, providing valuable insights about implementation challenges in emerging markets. Brazil’s large-scale fiscalisation experience is relevant for scaling systems.

Africa: Nigeria’s recent Peppol launch (August 2025) offers continental peer-to-peer lessons, especially around infrastructural challenges and stakeholder engagement in an African context.

This cross-pollination of expertise accelerates South Africa’s implementation and increases the chance of success by learning from international best practices and pitfalls.

From Challenge to Opportunity: The Strategic Perspective

For South African companies:

The einvoicing mandate is more than just compliance. It’s an opportunity for digital transformation that goes further:

  • Better cashflow management through faster invoice processing
  • Automated reconciliation and less manual work
  • Improved data for decision-making through structured information
  • Lower administrative costs in the long term
  • Better compliance with automatic VAT calculations

For international traders:

South Africa remains an attractive market despite (or thanks to) digitisation:

  • Large and growing economy (largest in Africa)
  • Strategic location as gateway to southern Africa
  • Strong infrastructure compared to other African countries
  • Skilled workforce and well-developed business services
  • Member of BRICS with growing international connections

Einvoicing should not be a reason to avoid South Africa. It does require conscious strategic choices and timely preparation.

Start Your Preparation

For companies with South African establishment:

Start NOW with awareness and planning. Although implementation only becomes mandatory in 2028, preparation requires substantial time. Don’t wait until 2027 when everyone tries to implement at once – then consultants and providers are overbooked and costs higher.

For international suppliers:

Evaluate your position and communicate with your South African customers. Voluntary Peppol adoption can distinguish you from competitors and strengthen relationships, especially if you already invest in Peppol for Europe, the Middle East or Asia-Pacific.

For both groups:

Don’t see South Africa’s einvoicing mandate as bureaucratic burden, but as part of Africa’s digital transformation. Countries that invest early in digital tax systems have lower fraud, more efficient collection and better economic growth. This ultimately benefits all honest entrepreneurs.

The choice for Peppol means South Africa chooses international interoperability instead of isolation. For companies already active in multiple markets, this is a strategic opportunity: one investment, multiple markets, future-proof.

Want to know more about South Africa’s einvoicing developments and how to prepare?

Visit Peppol.now for current information about international einvoicing mandates and check our overview of Peppol suppliers to find the provider that best suits your situation.

For specialist support with international einvoicing strategies, you can contact Solventis.

Stay informed about developments around South Africa’s Peppol mandate and other international einvoicing obligations via Peppol.now.

Frequently Asked Questions About South Africa’s Einvoicing Mandate

When does einvoicing become mandatory in South Africa?

Implementation is planned for 2028 or later. The exact date will be confirmed in the final legislation expected in 2026, after the second public consultation end of 2025.

Does the obligation also apply to companies without South African establishment?

Probably not for foreign suppliers without fixed establishment in South Africa, but final confirmation follows in 2026. Companies with a permanent establishment in South Africa do fall under the obligation.

What is the difference between the 5-corner model and other einvoicing systems?

The 5-corner model combines decentralised invoice exchange (via Peppol) with real-time reporting to the tax authority (SARS), without pre-clearance requirement. This is different from centralised systems like Italy (SDI) or Poland (KSeF) where invoices must be validated by the government beforehand.

Can I use my existing Peppol connectivity for South Africa?

Yes, probably. If you already have a Peppol Access Point provider for Belgium, France, Australia or other markets, this provider can often add South Africa to your connectivity. The Peppol infrastructure is international, although there may be South Africa-specific business rules.

What are the implementation costs?

Costs vary greatly per company size and situation. For medium-sized companies: software integration €2,000-€10,000, Peppol Access Point €20-€150/month, possibly per-invoice costs €0.10-€0.50. Savings through automation often exceed costs within 2-3 years.

How does this relate to Nigeria’s Peppol system?

Nigeria launched Africa’s first Peppol system in August 2025, but only for B2G transactions (supplies to government). South Africa plans a broader B2B mandate via the 5-corner model with real-time reporting, which goes further than Nigeria.

Should I take action now?

Yes, awareness and planning can start now. Monitor the second consultation (end 2025) and final legislation (2026). If you have a South African establishment, start with gap analysis and evaluation of your systems. As international supplier, evaluate the business case for voluntary adoption.

What happens if I’m not compliant in time?

Details about sanctions are still being worked out in the final legislation. Based on international examples, fines can vary from a few hundred to thousands of euros per invoice, with possible higher sanctions for repeated non-compliance.

How do I know which Peppol Access Point provider is suitable?

Once SARS publishes accreditation criteria (expected 2026), review providers on: South Africa expertise, international experience, ERP integration capabilities, pricing, support quality, and multi-country capabilities. On Peppol.now you’ll find comparisons of international providers.

Can South Africa still postpone the mandate?

Possibly, as we’ve seen with other countries (Slovenia postponement to 2027, UK to 2029). The government takes stakeholder feedback seriously. Follow the consultations to stay informed of any changes.

Where can I follow official South African Revenue Service (SARS) updates?

Visit the official SARS website for updates, or follow Peppol.now for Dutch summaries and practical implications for Dutch companies.

Sources

  • South African National Treasury – Draft 2025 Tax Administration Laws Amendment Bill (TALAB), 16 August 2025
  • Fiscal Solutions – South Africa Moves Towards Mandatory E-Invoicing by 2028
  • VATupdate – South Africa to Mandate E-Invoicing by 2028 to Combat VAT Fraud
  • Avalara – South Africa e-invoicing and VAT update: VAT hike cancelled, e-invoicing planned for 2028
  • VATcalc – South Africa VAT digital reporting & e-invoicing update
  • Storecove – E-invoicing and Peppol in South Africa
  • OpenPeppol – Country Profiles and Standards
  • European Commission – VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA)

This article was written on 8 December 2025 based on the most recent available information. South Africa’s einvoicing regulations are still in development. Always consult official SARS sources and specialist advisors for the most current information and advice specific to your situation.

Start with e-invoicing today

Prepare your organization for the digital future. Compare Peppol providers or request personal advice.

Peppol.nu - Your guide in the world of electronic invoicing